---
title: "Negative Brand Mention Statistics: 38.5% on News Pages"
url: https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online
description: "Negative brand mention statistics from 296,171 mentions: 38.5% of brand mentions on news pages are negative, against 26.2% on other websites. See the data."
lang: en
---
Share
Share on X: https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.suffdigital.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnegative-brand-mentions-online&text=38.5%25%20of%20Brand%20Mentions%20on%20News%20Pages%20Are%20Negative%20vs%2026.2%25%20on%20Other%20Websites
Share on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.suffdigital.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnegative-brand-mentions-online
Share on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.suffdigital.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnegative-brand-mentions-online
Share on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.suffdigital.com%2Fresources%2Fdata-studies%2Fnegative-brand-mentions-online&title=38.5%25%20of%20Brand%20Mentions%20on%20News%20Pages%20Are%20Negative%20vs%2026.2%25%20on%20Other%20Websites
When a news site mentions a brand, the mention is negative **38.5%** of the time, against 26.2% on blogs, stores and other websites. Across the web, 30.7% of recent brand mentions are negative, almost as many as the 35.4% that are positive, and insurance brands follow the same pattern, with 39.2% of their news mentions negative.
Analysis of 296,171 online mentions of 300 US brands and 29,998 mentions of 30 insurance brands · news sites, blogs, stores and other web pages, September 2026
## Key Findings
1. 1. **38.5%** of brand mentions on news pages are negative, against 26.2% of brand mentions on blogs, stores and other kinds of web page. Copy stat
2. 2. **30.7%** of recent online brand mentions are mainly negative, close to the 35.4% that are mainly positive, and 19.3% are strongly negative. Copy stat
3. 3. Online stores are the mildest place for a brand to be mentioned: **24.9%** of brand mentions on ecommerce pages are negative and 41.3% positive. Copy stat
4. 4. The median US brand has **28%** negative online mentions, and 37 of 252 brands with at least 200 mentions have more negative mentions than all others combined. Copy stat
5. 5. **33%** of recent online mentions of insurance brands are negative and 33% are positive, an even split, while 39.2% of their news mentions are negative. Copy stat
6. 6. Credit reporting brands draw the most negative online coverage, with more than **95%** of recent mentions negative, while Lulus (0.5%), Whirlpool Appliances (1.1%) and GE Appliances (1.9%) draw almost none. Copy stat
7. 7. Travelers Insurance has the least negative coverage of 30 insurance brands, with **11.8%** of recent mentions negative, about a third of the 33% insurance average. Copy stat
## Summary
A marketing team sets up alerts for its brand name and watches the mentions roll in: a product review on a blog, a listing on a retailer's site, a news story about the industry. Some are glowing, some are neutral, and some are complaints. The question every team eventually asks is how much negative coverage is normal, and whether its own industry is different.
The answer matters because tone shapes what people read when they search a brand, and what AI answers and journalists pick up when they describe it. Without a benchmark, a brand has no way to judge whether 30% negative coverage is a crisis or an ordinary month, or where its negative mentions are most likely to come from.
Across 300 US brands, **30.7%** of recent online mentions are mainly negative and 35.4% mainly positive. Where a brand is mentioned makes a clear difference: **38.5%** of mentions on news pages are negative, against 26.2% everywhere else, and online stores are the mildest place of all. Insurance, an industry people write about both when they shop and when they claim, shows the same shape: an even 33% negative and 33% positive, and 39.2% negative on news pages.
## What we measured
On September 23, 2026 we collected the 1,000 most recent online mentions of each of 300 well-known US brands, 296,171 mentions in all, from news sites, blogs, online stores, organization websites and other pages. We collected the same for 30 well-known US insurance brands, 29,998 mentions in all, and counted every web page that mentions each insurer to measure its total coverage. Each mention comes with three tone scores, for positive, negative and neutral, based on the text around the brand name. We grouped mentions by the type of page they appear on; a page can count as more than one type, such as a blog on a news site.
A mention is negative when its negative score is the highest of the three, and strongly negative when its negative score is above 0.5 on a scale of 0 to 1. 5.4% of mentions have no tone score. For brand-level figures we used the 252 brands with at least 200 mentions whose names are not everyday words, and a brand is majority negative when more than half its mentions are negative.
## Three in ten brand mentions are negative
30.7%
of recent online brand mentions are mainly negative.
Negative coverage is a large, ordinary part of every brand's footprint. Of the 296,171 mentions, 30.7% are mainly negative, 35.4% mainly positive and 28.6% neutral, with the remaining 5.4% unscored. Positive still edges out negative, but not by much: for every ten positive mentions, a brand can expect about nine negative ones.
Share of mentions by tone
Mainly positive
35.4%
Neutral
28.6%
Mainly negative
30.7%
Strongly negative
19.3%
Source: Suff Digital analysis of 296,171 online mentions of 300 US brands and 29,998 mentions of 30 insurance brands · news sites, blogs, stores and other web pages, September 2026
19.3% of mentions are strongly negative, about one in five: pages where the brand appears next to clearly critical language. Location makes no real difference. 30.4% of mentions on US pages are negative, against 30.8% on pages from elsewhere.
## News pages are the harshest place to be mentioned
News pages carry 36.3% of all brand mentions, and 38.5% of those mentions are negative, against 26.2% on other page types. News is where recalls, lawsuits, outages, layoffs and complaints get reported, so a brand's news coverage leans harsher than its coverage anywhere else. Positive mentions are also scarcer on news pages, at 32%.
Negative by page type
News
38.5%
Organization sites
31.6%
Blogs
28.5%
Ecommerce
24.9%
| Page type | Negative | Positive |
| --- | --- | --- |
| News | 38.5% | 32% |
| Organization sites | 31.6% | 33.4% |
| Blogs | 28.5% | 33.9% |
| Ecommerce | 24.9% | 41.3% |
Online stores are the mildest place to be mentioned: 24.9% of mentions on ecommerce pages are negative and 41.3% positive, the only page type where positive mentions clearly lead. Product listings, deal pages and retailer descriptions talk about brands in selling language, which pulls the tone up.
## Insurance brands show the same news gap
33%
of recent online mentions of insurance brands are negative, the same share as are positive.
Insurance gets written about at two moments: when people shop for a policy and when they make a claim. Price comparisons, bundling guides and safe-driver discounts generate a steady flow of positive mentions, while claims, premiums and cancellations generate the negative ones. The result sits slightly above the all-brand average on negativity, and the news gap is the same: news pages carry 34.9% of insurance mentions, and 39.2% of those are negative, against 29.7% elsewhere.
300 US brands
Mentions that are negative
30.7%
Mentions that are positive
35.4%
Mentions that are strongly negative
19.3%
News mentions that are negative
38.5%
Other mentions that are negative
26.2%
Share of mentions on news pages
36.3%
| Measure | 300 US brands | 30 insurance brands |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Mentions that are negative | 30.7% | 33% |
| Mentions that are positive | 35.4% | 33% |
| Mentions that are strongly negative | 19.3% | 19.4% |
| News mentions that are negative | 38.5% | 39.2% |
| Other mentions that are negative | 26.2% | 29.7% |
| Share of mentions on news pages | 36.3% | 34.9% |
Among eight industries compared in this series, insurance sits in the middle: its 33% negative share is lower than banks, airlines and telecom and higher than retail, streaming, fast food and hotels. Heavy coverage does not have to mean harsh coverage. State Farm is the most-mentioned insurer, on 11.3 million web pages, 30% of the total for 25 insurers ranked by coverage and more than twice The Hartford's 4.7 million, and both have a milder tone than the insurance average, at 24% and 24.3% negative.
## The typical brand has 28% negative mentions
The median brand, the one in the middle of all 300, has 28% negative mentions. Among the 252 brands with at least 200 mentions, 37 are majority negative, with more than half of their recent mentions negative, and 26 keep negative mentions to 10% or less.
Brands by share of mentions negative
Under 10%
26
10% to 20%
51
20% to 30%
63
30% to 40%
45
40% to 50%
30
Over 50%
37
The most common range is 20% to 30% negative, which holds 63 brands. A brand with 30% negative mentions is therefore close to typical, and the more useful benchmarks are its own trend over time and the gap between it and its direct competitors.
## Credit brands draw the harshest coverage, appliance makers the mildest
Tone varies widely by industry. Credit reporting brands have the most negative coverage of any group, with more than 95% of recent mentions negative. The next most negative categories are auto parts retail, stock photography and insurance comparison, each with a brand where between 77.2% and 89.9% of recent mentions are negative.
At the other end, appliance makers, real estate brands and a fashion retailer draw almost no negative coverage. The pattern follows the reason a brand gets written about: a brand that comes up mainly when something has gone wrong, such as a disputed credit report or a denied claim, scores far more negative than one that appears mainly in product listings, home guides and property pages.
Mentions negative by brand
Lulus
0.5%
Whirlpool Appliances
1.1%
GE Appliances
1.9%
REMAX
2.8%
Toyota
3.5%
ForSaleByOwner
3.8%
The General Insurance
3.9%
The same spread runs inside a single industry. Travelers Insurance has the least negative coverage of the 30 insurance brands, with 11.8% of recent mentions negative, followed by Northwestern Mutual (21.8%), Mercury Insurance (22%), Farmers Insurance (23.4%) and State Farm (24%), while four insurers have more than half of their recent mentions negative. Industry alone does not set the tone.
## What this means for brands and PR teams
Treat 30% negative mentions as normal, not as a crisis. The median brand sits at 28%, so the numbers worth acting on are a rising trend or a gap against direct competitors, not the raw share. Benchmark within your own industry: a credit or insurance brand and an appliance maker start from very different baselines, and even within insurance the mildest and harshest brands sit far apart.
Watch news coverage most closely. It carries more than a third of all brand mentions and the harshest tone, for insurers as for everyone else, and it is what journalists and AI answers draw on when they describe a brand. The most reliable way to shift it is to give reporters positive stories with substance: original data, useful guidance, clear expert comment and, for service brands, visible good news such as claims paid after a local disaster.
Track tone by page type as well as by volume, so you can see whether a spike comes from the news or from reviews and forums. Our media monitoring (https://www.suffdigital.com/services/digital-pr/brand-mentions) service tracks brand mentions and tone by source and flags negative news coverage early.
## Embed this research
Paste this on your site to embed the charts. It links back to the source automatically.
Source: 38.5% of Brand Mentions on News Pages Are Negative vs 26.2% on Other Websites - Suff Digital
## Cite this study
APA
Suff Digital. (2026). 38.5% of Brand Mentions on News Pages Are Negative vs 26.2% on Other Websites. https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online
Plain link
38.5% of Brand Mentions on News Pages Are Negative vs 26.2% on Other Websites - Suff Digital - https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online
## Frequently asked questions
### What share of online brand mentions are negative?
### Are news mentions of brands more negative than other mentions?
### What is a normal share of negative mentions for a brand?
### What share of online mentions of insurance brands are negative?
### Which kinds of brands get the most negative online coverage?
## Related studies
- Digital PR 54% of News Mentions of Airline Brands Are Negative vs 32% Elsewhere Online: https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/airline-brand-mentions-sentiment
- Digital PR Banks Get the Most Negative Online Coverage of Eight Industries: 40.6% of Mentions: https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/bank-brand-mentions-sentiment
- Digital PR Just 23% of Online Mentions of Telecom Brands Are Positive vs 43.6% for Hotels: https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/telecom-brand-mentions-sentiment
- Digital PR AT&T Is the Most-Mentioned Brand Online, With 197.6 Million Web Mentions: https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/most-mentioned-brands-online
## Structured data
```json
[
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "Organization",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#organization",
"name": "Suff Digital",
"alternateName": "Suff Digital Marketing",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/",
"logo": {
"@type": "ImageObject",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#logo",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/logo.png",
"contentUrl": "https://www.suffdigital.com/logo.png",
"caption": "Suff Digital"
},
"image": {
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#logo"
},
"description": "Suff Digital is a full-stack digital marketing agency that turns websites into predictable revenue engines, SEO, paid media, content, CRO, and web design built around revenue, not vanity metrics.",
"slogan": "Digital marketing built for what's next.",
"email": "hello@suffdigital.com",
"telephone": "+1-629-236-0099",
"foundingDate": "2022",
"founder": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Matt Suffoletto",
"jobTitle": "Founder & CEO"
},
"contactPoint": [
{
"@type": "ContactPoint",
"telephone": "+1-629-236-0099",
"email": "hello@suffdigital.com",
"contactType": "sales",
"areaServed": "US",
"availableLanguage": [
"en"
]
}
],
"address": {
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"addressLocality": "Nashville",
"addressRegion": "TN",
"postalCode": "37219",
"addressCountry": "US"
},
"areaServed": {
"@type": "Country",
"name": "United States"
},
"sameAs": [
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/suff-digital/",
"https://www.instagram.com/suffdigital/",
"https://www.youtube.com/@suffdigitalmarketing",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@suffdigital"
],
"knowsAbout": [
"Search Engine Optimization",
"Pay-Per-Click Advertising",
"Paid Social Advertising",
"Conversion Rate Optimization",
"Web Design",
"Digital PR",
"Link Building",
"Website Migration",
"Website Maintenance and Support",
"Technical SEO",
"Local SEO",
"AI Search Optimization"
],
"hasOfferCatalog": {
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Suff Digital Services",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Search Engine Optimization (SEO)",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Advertising",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/ppc"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Paid Social Advertising",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/paid-social"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/cro"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Web Design",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/web-design"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Digital PR & Link Building",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/digital-pr"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Website Migration",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/website-migration"
}
},
{
"@type": "Offer",
"itemOffered": {
"@type": "Service",
"name": "Website Maintenance & Support",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/services/website-maintenance"
}
}
]
}
},
{
"@type": "WebSite",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#website",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/",
"name": "Suff Digital",
"inLanguage": "en-US",
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#organization"
}
}
]
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [
{
"@type": "Article",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online#article",
"headline": "38.5% of Brand Mentions on News Pages Are Negative vs 26.2% on Other Websites",
"description": "When a news site mentions a brand, the mention is negative 38.5% of the time, against 26.2% on blogs, stores and other websites. Across the web, 30.7% of recent brand mentions are negative, almost as many as the 35.4% that are positive, and insurance brands follow the same pattern, with 39.2% of their news mentions negative.",
"image": [
"https://www.suffdigital.com/images/suff-digital-share-16x9.jpg"
],
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online",
"datePublished": "2026-09-24",
"dateModified": "2026-09-24",
"author": {
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Matt Suffoletto",
"jobTitle": "Founder & CEO",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/who-we-are"
},
"publisher": {
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#organization"
},
"mainEntityOfPage": {
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online",
"@type": "WebPage"
},
"isPartOf": {
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#website"
}
},
{
"@type": "BreadcrumbList",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online#breadcrumb",
"itemListElement": [
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 1,
"name": "Home",
"item": "https://www.suffdigital.com/"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 2,
"name": "Resources",
"item": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 3,
"name": "Data Studies",
"item": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies"
},
{
"@type": "ListItem",
"position": 4,
"name": "38.5% of Brand Mentions on News Pages Are Negative vs 26.2% on Other Websites"
}
]
},
{
"@type": "Dataset",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online#dataset",
"name": "38.5% of Brand Mentions on News Pages Are Negative vs 26.2% on Other Websites",
"description": "When a news site mentions a brand, the mention is negative 38.5% of the time, against 26.2% on blogs, stores and other websites. Across the web, 30.7% of recent brand mentions are negative, almost as many as the 35.4% that are positive, and insurance brands follow the same pattern, with 39.2% of their news mentions negative.",
"url": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online",
"creator": {
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/#organization"
},
"datePublished": "2026-09-24",
"dateModified": "2026-09-24",
"license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
"isAccessibleForFree": true,
"measurementTechnique": "Web pages that mention each brand by name, each scored for positive, negative and neutral tone; total web mentions per insurer"
},
{
"@type": "FAQPage",
"@id": "https://www.suffdigital.com/resources/data-studies/negative-brand-mentions-online#faq",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What share of online brand mentions are negative?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "30.7% of recent online brand mentions are mainly negative (September 2026), against 35.4% positive and 28.6% neutral, and 19.3% are strongly negative."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Are news mentions of brands more negative than other mentions?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Yes. 38.5% of brand mentions on news pages are negative, against 26.2% of brand mentions on other kinds of web page."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What is a normal share of negative mentions for a brand?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "The median US brand has 28% negative online mentions, and the most common range is 20% to 30% negative."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "What share of online mentions of insurance brands are negative?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "33% of recent online mentions of insurance brands are negative, the same share as are positive, and 39.2% of news mentions of insurance brands are negative."
}
},
{
"@type": "Question",
"name": "Which kinds of brands get the most negative online coverage?",
"acceptedAnswer": {
"@type": "Answer",
"text": "Credit reporting brands, with more than 95% of recent online mentions negative, followed by auto parts retail, stock photography and insurance comparison brands. Appliance makers such as Whirlpool Appliances (1.1%) and GE Appliances (1.9%) get the least."
}
}
]
}
]
}
]
```